This study investigated water and sanitary conditions of a typical faculty of Public Health building, University of Ibadan, Nigeria. A cross-sectional study was conducted and 108 consented students and staff members were interviewed using a semi-structured questionnaire. Fifteen (15) toilet facilities with 45 rooms were also observed using an observational checklist. Respondents’ age was 28.9±5.5 years, 63.0% were female, 92.6% were students and all participants had completed tertiary education. The main source of water supply into the building was piped water (85.2%) and 77.9% used it for flushing toilet. Only 22.2% reported that the water source is readily accessible all the time while 63.0% stated that the quantity of water available got depleted during the afternoon time. On-site observations revealed that 8 (53.4%) of the toilet facilities had inadequate water supply. Majority (81.5%) reported water closet as the main type of sanitary convenience in the building while the major shortcomings of the toilets mentioned were non-accessibility (88.9%) and shortage of water supply (77.8%). All (100%) of the toilet rooms observed had no severe odour while 2 (4.4%) of the toilet rooms had appreciable quantities of vectors breeding. About fifty-nine percent had good attitude towards the sanitary conveniences within the building and significantly, 75.0% of female respondents had good attitude compared to 25.0% of their male counterpart (p<0.05). Twelve (11.1%) respondents said they practiced handwashing with water and soap and none (0.0%) reported presence of signs that encourage good hygiene practices in the toilet. Wash hand basins was observed to be present and functional within all the 15 (100%) toilet facilities, water was present in 10 (66.7%) of the facilities while soap was absent in all the 15 (100%) facilities observed. Constant water supply should be sustained, handwashing materials and signs that encourage good hygiene practices should be provided within the toilets.
Published in | Science Journal of Public Health (Volume 5, Issue 2) |
DOI | 10.11648/j.sjph.20170502.17 |
Page(s) | 103-109 |
Creative Commons |
This is an Open Access article, distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, provided the original work is properly cited. |
Copyright |
Copyright © The Author(s), 2017. Published by Science Publishing Group |
Water Quality, Sanitary Condition, Sanitary Conveniences, Hand Washing Practice
[1] | Singh, M. Opening address to the third South Asian conference on sanitation, New Delhi, 18 November 2008. Available: https://sanitationupdates.wordpress.com/category/regions/south-asia/page/71/ [Accessed 06 January 2017]. |
[2] | Esrey, S. A., Potash, J. B., Roberts, L. and Shiff, C. Effects of improved water supply and sanitation on ascariasis, diarrhoea, dracunculiasis, hookworm infection, schistosomiasis, and trachoma. Bulletin of World Health Organization, 1991; 69: 609–621. |
[3] | WHO/UNICEF. Progress on sanitation and drinking-water – 2010 update. Geneva: World Health Organization, 2010; pp1-60. |
[4] | WHO. Creating healthy cities in the 21st century. In: Satterthwaite D, editor. The Earthscan reader on sustainable cities. London: Earthscan Publications, 1999; pp 137–172. |
[5] | Feachem, R. G., Bradley, D. J., Garelick, H. and Mara, D. D. Sanitation and disease. Health aspects of wastewater and excreta management. Chichester: John Wiley and Sons. 1983; 326 p. |
[6] | WHO/UNICEF. Joint Monitoring Programme for Water Supply and Sanitation, Global water supply and sanitation assessment, report, 2000. WHO, Geneva. 2000; Available: http://www.who.int/water_sanitation_health/monitoring/jmp2000.pdf [accessed 06 January 2017]. |
[7] | WHO. Water Sanitation and Hygiene links to Health, Facts and Figures, updated March 2004. WHO, Geneva. 2004; Available: http://www.who.int/water_sanitation_health/en/factsfigures04.pdf [accessed 06 January 2017]. |
[8] | Enabor, B., Sridhar, M. K. C., and Olaseha, I. O. Integrated water management by urban poor women: A Nigerian slum experience. Water Resources Development. 1998; 14 (4): 505-512. |
[9] | Oloruntoba, E. O., Agbede, O. A. and Sridhar, M. K. C. Seasonal variation in physicochemical quality of household drinking water in Ibadan, Nigeria. ASSET- An International Journal. 2006; (Series B) 5 (1): 70-81. |
[10] | Oloruntoba, E. O. and Sridhar, M. K. C. Bacteriological quality of drinking water from source to household in Ibadan, Nigeria. African Journal of Medicine and Medical Sciences. 2007; 36: 169-175. |
[11] | DFID. Water: Knowledge and Research: Department of International Development. 2004; Issue 18: p12. |
[12] | Jenkins, M. W. and Curtis, V. Achieving the ‘good life’: Why some people want latrines in rural Benin. Soc Sci Med. 2005; 61: 2446–59. |
[13] | Jenkins, M. W. and Scott, B. Behavioral indicators of household decision-making and demand for sanitation and potential gains from social marketing in Ghana. Social Science Med. 2007; 64: 2427–42. |
[14] | Mahon, T. and Fernandes, M. Menstrual hygiene in South Asia: a neglected issue for WASH (water, sanitation and hygiene) programmes. Gend Dev. 2010; 18.1: 99–113. |
[15] | UNICEF and WHO. Diarrhea: Why children are still dying and what can be done Geneva. 2009; Available: whqlibdoc.who.int/publications/2009/9789241598415_eng.pdf [accessed 06 January 2017]. |
[16] | Water Supply and Sanitation Collaborative Council. Vision 21: A shared vision for hygiene and water supply and framework for action. Proceedings of the Second World Water Forum, The Hague – 22, March, Geneva, Switzerland. 2010. |
[17] | Siwolo, I. A. The Financial Challenges Facing the Management of Primary Schools after the Introduction of F. P. E: A case of Wetlands Division, Nairobi. Kenya; Unpublished Med Thesis. Nairobi: Kenyatta University. 2004. |
[18] | Asyago, B. An Investigation into the Challenges Facing the Free Primary Education Management: The Case of Machakos District. Kenya. Unpublished Med Thesis, Nairobi: Kenyatta University. 2005. |
[19] | Mugo, E. W. Strategies Adopted by Primary Schools Head teachers in Managing Free Primary Education in Embu District Kenya: Unpublished Med Thesis, Nairobi: Kenyatta University. 2006. |
[20] | Zomerplaag, J. and Mooijman, A. Child – friendly hygiene and sanitation facilities in schools: indispensable to effective hygiene education. Technical paper series No. 47. International water and sanitation centre, Delft and United Nations Children’s Fund, New York. 2005. |
[21] | World Health Organization. WHO Guidelines on Hygiene Practices. WHO Press, Geneva 27, Switzerland. 2006 |
[22] | World Health Organization. Water, Sanitation and Hygiene Standards for Schools in Low-Cost Settings. Geneva, Switzerland. 2009. |
[23] | Njuguna V., Karanja B., Thuranira M., Shordt K., Snel M., Cairncross S., Biran A., Schmidt W.-P. The Sustainability and Impact of School Sanitation, Water and Hygiene Education in Kenya. UNICEF and IRC International Water and Sanitation Centre; New York, NY, USA and Delft, The Netherlands. 2008. |
[24] | Lundblad B., Hellstrom A. L. Perceptions of school toilets as a cause for irregular toilet habits among schoolchildren aged 6 to 16 years. Journal of School Health. 2005; 75: 125–128. |
[25] | Vernon S., Lundblad B., Hellstrom A. L. Children’s experiences of school toilets present a risk to their physical and psychological health. Child Care, Health Development. 2003; 29: 47–53. |
[26] | Bolt, E., Shordt, K. and Krukkert, I. School sanitation and hygiene education results from the assessment of a 6-country pilot project delft. International Water and Sanitation Centre, Netherlands. 2006. |
APA Style
Adejumo Mumuni, Ana Godson Rowland, Oloruntoba Elizabeth Omoladun, Morakinyo Oyewale Mayowa, Hammed Taiwo Babatunde. (2017). Water and Sanitary Conditions of a Typical Faculty of Public Health Building in a Nigerian University. Science Journal of Public Health, 5(2), 103-109. https://doi.org/10.11648/j.sjph.20170502.17
ACS Style
Adejumo Mumuni; Ana Godson Rowland; Oloruntoba Elizabeth Omoladun; Morakinyo Oyewale Mayowa; Hammed Taiwo Babatunde. Water and Sanitary Conditions of a Typical Faculty of Public Health Building in a Nigerian University. Sci. J. Public Health 2017, 5(2), 103-109. doi: 10.11648/j.sjph.20170502.17
AMA Style
Adejumo Mumuni, Ana Godson Rowland, Oloruntoba Elizabeth Omoladun, Morakinyo Oyewale Mayowa, Hammed Taiwo Babatunde. Water and Sanitary Conditions of a Typical Faculty of Public Health Building in a Nigerian University. Sci J Public Health. 2017;5(2):103-109. doi: 10.11648/j.sjph.20170502.17
@article{10.11648/j.sjph.20170502.17, author = {Adejumo Mumuni and Ana Godson Rowland and Oloruntoba Elizabeth Omoladun and Morakinyo Oyewale Mayowa and Hammed Taiwo Babatunde}, title = {Water and Sanitary Conditions of a Typical Faculty of Public Health Building in a Nigerian University}, journal = {Science Journal of Public Health}, volume = {5}, number = {2}, pages = {103-109}, doi = {10.11648/j.sjph.20170502.17}, url = {https://doi.org/10.11648/j.sjph.20170502.17}, eprint = {https://article.sciencepublishinggroup.com/pdf/10.11648.j.sjph.20170502.17}, abstract = {This study investigated water and sanitary conditions of a typical faculty of Public Health building, University of Ibadan, Nigeria. A cross-sectional study was conducted and 108 consented students and staff members were interviewed using a semi-structured questionnaire. Fifteen (15) toilet facilities with 45 rooms were also observed using an observational checklist. Respondents’ age was 28.9±5.5 years, 63.0% were female, 92.6% were students and all participants had completed tertiary education. The main source of water supply into the building was piped water (85.2%) and 77.9% used it for flushing toilet. Only 22.2% reported that the water source is readily accessible all the time while 63.0% stated that the quantity of water available got depleted during the afternoon time. On-site observations revealed that 8 (53.4%) of the toilet facilities had inadequate water supply. Majority (81.5%) reported water closet as the main type of sanitary convenience in the building while the major shortcomings of the toilets mentioned were non-accessibility (88.9%) and shortage of water supply (77.8%). All (100%) of the toilet rooms observed had no severe odour while 2 (4.4%) of the toilet rooms had appreciable quantities of vectors breeding. About fifty-nine percent had good attitude towards the sanitary conveniences within the building and significantly, 75.0% of female respondents had good attitude compared to 25.0% of their male counterpart (p<0.05). Twelve (11.1%) respondents said they practiced handwashing with water and soap and none (0.0%) reported presence of signs that encourage good hygiene practices in the toilet. Wash hand basins was observed to be present and functional within all the 15 (100%) toilet facilities, water was present in 10 (66.7%) of the facilities while soap was absent in all the 15 (100%) facilities observed. Constant water supply should be sustained, handwashing materials and signs that encourage good hygiene practices should be provided within the toilets.}, year = {2017} }
TY - JOUR T1 - Water and Sanitary Conditions of a Typical Faculty of Public Health Building in a Nigerian University AU - Adejumo Mumuni AU - Ana Godson Rowland AU - Oloruntoba Elizabeth Omoladun AU - Morakinyo Oyewale Mayowa AU - Hammed Taiwo Babatunde Y1 - 2017/02/17 PY - 2017 N1 - https://doi.org/10.11648/j.sjph.20170502.17 DO - 10.11648/j.sjph.20170502.17 T2 - Science Journal of Public Health JF - Science Journal of Public Health JO - Science Journal of Public Health SP - 103 EP - 109 PB - Science Publishing Group SN - 2328-7950 UR - https://doi.org/10.11648/j.sjph.20170502.17 AB - This study investigated water and sanitary conditions of a typical faculty of Public Health building, University of Ibadan, Nigeria. A cross-sectional study was conducted and 108 consented students and staff members were interviewed using a semi-structured questionnaire. Fifteen (15) toilet facilities with 45 rooms were also observed using an observational checklist. Respondents’ age was 28.9±5.5 years, 63.0% were female, 92.6% were students and all participants had completed tertiary education. The main source of water supply into the building was piped water (85.2%) and 77.9% used it for flushing toilet. Only 22.2% reported that the water source is readily accessible all the time while 63.0% stated that the quantity of water available got depleted during the afternoon time. On-site observations revealed that 8 (53.4%) of the toilet facilities had inadequate water supply. Majority (81.5%) reported water closet as the main type of sanitary convenience in the building while the major shortcomings of the toilets mentioned were non-accessibility (88.9%) and shortage of water supply (77.8%). All (100%) of the toilet rooms observed had no severe odour while 2 (4.4%) of the toilet rooms had appreciable quantities of vectors breeding. About fifty-nine percent had good attitude towards the sanitary conveniences within the building and significantly, 75.0% of female respondents had good attitude compared to 25.0% of their male counterpart (p<0.05). Twelve (11.1%) respondents said they practiced handwashing with water and soap and none (0.0%) reported presence of signs that encourage good hygiene practices in the toilet. Wash hand basins was observed to be present and functional within all the 15 (100%) toilet facilities, water was present in 10 (66.7%) of the facilities while soap was absent in all the 15 (100%) facilities observed. Constant water supply should be sustained, handwashing materials and signs that encourage good hygiene practices should be provided within the toilets. VL - 5 IS - 2 ER -