As a long series of empirical studies have shown, the ICT (Information and Communication Technologies) sector has acquired a crucially important role in the economies of the most industrialized nations. In this context, the purpose of the paper is quantitatively to assess the economic structure of ICT using the world input-output table. For each of the 35 sectors of activity shown in the table, two indices were computed: backward linkage (power of dispersion) to assess global vertical integration; and forward linkage (sensitivity dispersion) to assess horizontal integration. Several features of these indices were found in order to categorize the sectors most connected with ICT.
Published in | Journal of World Economic Research (Volume 2, Issue 2) |
DOI | 10.11648/j.jwer.20130202.11 |
Page(s) | 20-25 |
Creative Commons |
This is an Open Access article, distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, provided the original work is properly cited. |
Copyright |
Copyright © The Author(s), 2013. Published by Science Publishing Group |
Input-Output Models, Information and Communication Technologies, Key Sector, Backward Linkage, Forward Linkage, Inter Industry Dependencies
[1] | Beardsell, M., and Henderson, V. (1999). Spatial evolution of the computer industry in the USA. European Economic Review 43, 431–456. |
[2] | Edquist, H. (2005). The Swedish ICT miracle - myth or reality?. Information Economics and Policy, 17, 275-301. |
[3] | Jorgenson Dale W., Khuong V. (2005). Information Technology and the World Economy. Scand. Journal of Economics 107(4), 631–650. |
[4] | Pilat, D., and Wölfl, A. (2004). ICT production and ICT use: what role in aggregate productivity growth. In: The Economic Impact of ICT Measurement, Evidence and Implications. OECD, Paris. |
[5] | Wong, P.K. (2002). ICT production and diffusion in Asia. Information Economics and Policy, 14 (2), 167–187. |
[6] | Istat (2009) Le tecnologie dell’informazione e della comunicazione nelle imprese. Statistiche in breve. |
[7] | Timmer, M. (2012). The World Input‐Output database (WIOD): contents, sources and methods. downloadable at http://www.wiod.org. |
[8] | Bryan, J., Jones, C., and Munday, M. (2005). Investigating the potential of key sectors using multisectoral qualitative analysis: a Welsh case study. Environment and Planning C, 23, 633-656. |
[9] | Kraemer, K.L., and Dedrick, J. (2001). Information technology and productivity: results and policy implications of cross-country studies. In: Pohjola, M., (Ed.) Information Technology, Productivity and Economic Growth. Oxford University Press, 257-279. |
[10] | Leontief, W. (1974). Structure of the world economy: outline of a simple Input-Output formulation. The American Economic Review, 64, 823–834. |
[11] | Beyers, W.B. (1976). Empirical identification of key sectors: some further evidence, Environment and Planning A, 8, 231-236. |
[12] | Cella, G. (1984). The input-output measurement of interindustry linkages. Oxford Bulletin of Economics and statistics, 46, 73-84. |
[13] | Clements, B.J. (1990). On the decomposition and normalization of interindustry linkages. Economic Letters, 33 (4), 337-340. |
[14] | Dietzenbacher, E. (1992). The Measurement of interindustry linkages. Key Sectors in the Netherlands. Economic Modeling, 9, 419-437. |
[15] | Guccione, A. (1986). The Input-Output measurement of interindustry linkages: A comment. Oxford Bulletin of Economics and Statistics, 48 (4), 373-377. |
[16] | Hewings, G. (1982). The empirical identification of key sectors in an economy: a regional perspective. Developing Economies, 20(2),173-195. |
[17] | McGilvray, J. (1977). Linkages, key-sectors and de-velopment strategy. In Leontief, W., (ed.) Structure, System and Economic Policy, UK, Cambridge University Press, 49-56. |
[18] | Richardson, H.W. (1972). Input-Output and regional economics. New York, John Wiley & Son. |
[19] | Simpson, D., and Tsukui, J. (1965). The fundamental structure of input-output tables, an international comparison. The Review of Economics and Statistics, 47, 434-446. |
[20] | Van Ark B. (2002). Measuring the new economy: an international comparative perspective. Review of In-come and Wealth 48, 1, 1-14. |
[21] | OECD, (2000). Measuring the ICT sector. OECD, Paris. |
[22] | Chenery, H.B. and Watanabe, T. (1958). International comparisons of the structure of production. Econometrica, 26, 487-521. |
[23] | Dietzenbacher, E. (2002). Interregional multipliers: looking backward, looking forward. Regional Studies, 36, 125-136. |
[24] | Hirschman, A.O. (1958). The strategy of economic development. New Haven, Conn: Yale University Press. |
[25] | OECD (2009). Guide to measuring the information society, OECD, Paris. |
[26] | OECD, (2008). The contribution of the ICT sectors to Economic growth in OECD countries: backward and forward Linkages. OECD, Paris. |
[27] | Rasmussen, N. (1956). Studies in intersectoral relation. North Holland, Amsterdam. |
[28] | Schultz, S. (1977). Approaches to identifying key sectors Empirically by means of Input-output analysis. Journal of Development Studies, 14, 77-96. |
[29] | Sonis, M, Hewings, G., and Guo, J. (2000). A new image of classical key sector analysis: minimum in formation decomposition of the Leontief inverse. Economics System Research, 13(3), 401-423. |
[30] | Sonis, M., Guilhoto, J.J., Hewings, G.J., and Martins, E.B. (1995). Linkages, key sectors and structural change: some new perspectives. Developing Economies, 33, 233-270. |
[31] | Morrissey K., and O’Donoghue C. (2013). The role of the marine sector in the Irish national economy: An input–output analysis. Marine Policy, 37, 230–238 |
[32] | Karagiannis, G., and Tzouvelekas, V. (2010). Sectoral linkages and industrial efficiency: a dilemma or a requisition in identifying development priorities?. Annals of Regional Science, 45, 207–233. |
[33] | Beynon, M.J., and Munday, M. (2008). Stochastic key sector analysis: an application to a regional in- put–output framework. Annals of Regional Science, 42, 863–877. |
[34] | Alcantara, V., and Padilla, E. (2003). Key sectors in final energy consumption: an input–output application to the Spanish case. Energy Policy, 31, 1673–1678. |
[35] | Midmore, P., Munday, M., and Roberts, A. (2006). Assessing industry linkages using regional in- put–output tables. Regional Studies, 40, 329-343. |
[36] | Bulmer, V. T. (1982). Input-output analysis in developing countries. John Wiley, New York. |
[37] | Hazari, B.R. 1970. Empirical identification of key sectors in the Indian economy. Review of Economics and Statistics, 52, 301-305. |
[38] | Jones, L. P. (1976). The measurement of Hirschmanian Linkages. Quarterly Journal of Economics, 90, 323–333. |
[39] | Laumas, P. (1976). Key sectors in some underdeveloped countries: A Reply. Kyklos, 29, 767–769. |
[40] | Miller, R. E., and Blair, P. D. (2009). Input Output analysis foundation and extensions. Cambridge University Press. |
[41] | Oosterhaven, J. (1988). On the plausibility of the Supply-Driven Input-Output model. Journal of Regional Science, 28, 203-271. |
[42] | Ghosh, A. (1958). Input-output approach to an allocative system. Economica, 25, 58–64. |
APA Style
Elvio Mattioli, Giuseppe Ricciardo Lamonica. (2013). The ICT Role in the Word Economy: An Input-Output Analysis. Journal of World Economic Research, 2(2), 20-25. https://doi.org/10.11648/j.jwer.20130202.11
ACS Style
Elvio Mattioli; Giuseppe Ricciardo Lamonica. The ICT Role in the Word Economy: An Input-Output Analysis. J. World Econ. Res. 2013, 2(2), 20-25. doi: 10.11648/j.jwer.20130202.11
AMA Style
Elvio Mattioli, Giuseppe Ricciardo Lamonica. The ICT Role in the Word Economy: An Input-Output Analysis. J World Econ Res. 2013;2(2):20-25. doi: 10.11648/j.jwer.20130202.11
@article{10.11648/j.jwer.20130202.11, author = {Elvio Mattioli and Giuseppe Ricciardo Lamonica}, title = {The ICT Role in the Word Economy: An Input-Output Analysis}, journal = {Journal of World Economic Research}, volume = {2}, number = {2}, pages = {20-25}, doi = {10.11648/j.jwer.20130202.11}, url = {https://doi.org/10.11648/j.jwer.20130202.11}, eprint = {https://article.sciencepublishinggroup.com/pdf/10.11648.j.jwer.20130202.11}, abstract = {As a long series of empirical studies have shown, the ICT (Information and Communication Technologies) sector has acquired a crucially important role in the economies of the most industrialized nations. In this context, the purpose of the paper is quantitatively to assess the economic structure of ICT using the world input-output table. For each of the 35 sectors of activity shown in the table, two indices were computed: backward linkage (power of dispersion) to assess global vertical integration; and forward linkage (sensitivity dispersion) to assess horizontal integration. Several features of these indices were found in order to categorize the sectors most connected with ICT.}, year = {2013} }
TY - JOUR T1 - The ICT Role in the Word Economy: An Input-Output Analysis AU - Elvio Mattioli AU - Giuseppe Ricciardo Lamonica Y1 - 2013/06/20 PY - 2013 N1 - https://doi.org/10.11648/j.jwer.20130202.11 DO - 10.11648/j.jwer.20130202.11 T2 - Journal of World Economic Research JF - Journal of World Economic Research JO - Journal of World Economic Research SP - 20 EP - 25 PB - Science Publishing Group SN - 2328-7748 UR - https://doi.org/10.11648/j.jwer.20130202.11 AB - As a long series of empirical studies have shown, the ICT (Information and Communication Technologies) sector has acquired a crucially important role in the economies of the most industrialized nations. In this context, the purpose of the paper is quantitatively to assess the economic structure of ICT using the world input-output table. For each of the 35 sectors of activity shown in the table, two indices were computed: backward linkage (power of dispersion) to assess global vertical integration; and forward linkage (sensitivity dispersion) to assess horizontal integration. Several features of these indices were found in order to categorize the sectors most connected with ICT. VL - 2 IS - 2 ER -