International Environmental Agreements (IEAs): An Integrated Perspective on the Concept of Effectiveness

Chenaz B. Seelarbokus

doi:doi:10.11648/j.ijepp.20140202.15

| Peer-Reviewed

International Environmental Agreements (IEAs): An Integrated Perspective on the Concept of Effectiveness

Chenaz B. Seelarbokus

Published in International Journal of Environmental Protection and Policy (Volume 2, Issue 2)

Received: 27 February 2014 Published: 30 March 2014

Views: Downloads:

Download PDF

Share This Article

Twitter
Linked In
Facebook

Abstract

The effectiveness of international environmental agreements (IEAs) has been conceptualized in various ways in the literature, and several assessment methodologies have been postulated. There has not been any attempt at integrating the various perspectives, nor of determining the fit between the assessment methodology and the goals of the IEAs or of the IEA institutions. This article reviews the various effectiveness conceptualizations, and proposes the ‘effectiveness web’ as an integrative framework for understanding the inter-relationships that exist among the various determinants and potential indicators of IEA effectiveness. This article argues for an evolutionary and dynamic conceptualization of IEA effectiveness, as well as a multi-track assessment of effectiveness, which is more in line with the activities of the IEA institutions. This article identifies potential indicators for various stages of the life-cycle of an IEA, and using the premise of global environmental sustainability as guiding framework, provides a hierarchy of effectiveness assessment methodologies.

Published in	International Journal of Environmental Protection and Policy (Volume 2, Issue 2)
DOI	10.11648/j.ijepp.20140202.15
Page(s)	76-95
Creative Commons	This is an Open Access article, distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, provided the original work is properly cited.
Copyright	Copyright © The Author(s), 2014. Published by Science Publishing Group

Keywords

Effectiveness, Environmental Regimes, Environmental Treaties, International Environmental Agreements, International Environmental Cooperation, Assessment

References

[1]	GAO International environmental agreements are not well monitored : report to congressional requesters; GAO: Washington, D.C., 1992.
[2]	Sand, P. H., Lessons Learned in Global Governance. In Environmental Protection and International Law, Lang, W., Neuhold H., and Zemanek K., Ed. Graham & Trotman: Boston, 1992.
[3]	Mitchell, R. B., Intentional Oil Pollution at Sea: Environmental Policy and Treaty Compliance. The MIT Press: Cambridge, Massachusetts, 1994.
[4]	Churchill, R., The Contribution of Existing Agreements for the Conservation of Terrestrial Species and Habitats to the Maintenance of Biodiversity. In International Law and the Conservation of Biological Diversity, Bowman, M.; Redgwell, C., Eds. Kluwer Law International: Boston, 1996; Chapter 4.
[5]	Chayes, A.; Chayes, A. H., On Compliance. International Organization 1993, 47, (2), 175-205.
[6]	Young, O. R., The Effectiveness of International Environmental Regimes : Causal Connections and Behavioral Mechanisms. MIT Press: Cambridge, Mass., 1999; p xiv, 326.
[7]	Greene, O., Environmental Regimes: Effectiveness and Implementation Review. In The Environment and International Relations, Vogler, J.; Imber, M. F., Eds. Routledge: New York, 1996; pp 196-214.
[8]	Wettestad, J., Designing Effective Environmental Regimes: The Conditional Keys. Global Governance 2001, 7, (3), 317-341.
[9]	Helm, C.; Sprinz, D., Measuring the Effectiveness of International Environmental Regimes. The Journal of Conflict Resolution 2000, 44, (5), 630-652.
[10]	Mitchell, R. B., Problem Structure, Institutional Design, and the Relative Effectiveness of International Environmental Agreements. Global Environmental Politics 2006, 6, (3), 72-89.
[11]	Böhmelt, T.; Pilster, U. H., International Environmental Regimes: Legalisation, Flexibility and Effectiveness. Australian Journal of Political Science 2010, 45, (2), 245-260.
[12]	Frantzi, S.; Carter, N. T.; Lovett, J. C., Exploring discourses on international environmental regime effectiveness with Q methodology: a case study of the Mediterranean Action Plan. . Journal of Environmental Management 2009, 90, (1), 177-186.
[13]	Breitmeier, H.; Underdal, A.; Young, O. R., The Effectiveness of International Environmental Regimes: Comparing and Contrasting Findings from Quantitative Research1. International Studies Review 2011, 13, (4), 579-605.
[14]	Hovi, J.; Sprinz, D. F.; Underdal, A., The Oslo-Postdam Solution to Measuring Regime Effectiveness: Critique, Response, and the Road Ahead. Global Environmental Politics 2003, 3, (3), 74-96.
[15]	Breitmeier, H.; Underdal, A.; Young, O. R., The Effectiveness of International Environmental Regimes: Comparing and Contrasting Findings from Quantitative Research. International Studies Review 2011, 13, (4), 579-605.
[16]	Andresen, S.; Ostreng, W., International Resource Management: The Role of Science and Politics. Belhaven Press: London, 1989.
[17]	Levy, M. A.; Keohane, R. O.; Haas, P. M., Improving the Effectiveness of International Environmental Institutions. In Institutions for the Earth: Sources of Effective Environmental Protection, Haas, P. M.; Keohane, R. O.; Levy, M. A., Eds. MIT Press: Cambridge, 1993; pp. 397-426.
[18]	Vogler, J., The Global Commons: A Regime Analysis. John Wiley & Sons: New York, 1995.
[19]	Levy, M. A.; Young, O. R. In The Effectiveness of International Regimes, Annual Convention of International Studies Association, Washington, D.C., 29 March - 1 April 1994, 1994; Washington, D.C., 1994.
[20]	Young, O. R.; Levy, M. A., The Effectiveness of International Environmental Regimes. In The Effectiveness of International Environmental Regimes: Causal Connections and Behavioral Mechanisms, Young, O. R., Ed. The MIT Press: Cambridge, Massachusetts, 1999; pp. 1-32.
[21]	Sprinz, D.; Vaahtoranta, T., The interest-based explanation of international environmental policy. International Organization 1994, 48, (1), 77-105.
[22]	Young, O. R., Rights, Rules, and Resources in World Affairs. In Global Governance: Drawing Insights from the Environmental Experience, Young, O. R., Ed. The MIT Press: Cambridge, Massachusetts, 1997; pp. 1-23.
[23]	Underdal, A., One Question, Two Answers. In Environmental Regime Effectiveness: Confronting Theory with Evidence, Miles, E. L.; Underdal, A.; Andresen, S.; Wettestad, J.; Skjaerseth, J. B.; Carlin, E. M., Eds. MIT Press: Cambridge, Massachusetts, 2002; pp. 3-45.
[24]	DeSombre, E. R., Domestic Sources of International Environmental Policy: Industry, Environmentalists, and US Power. The MIT Press: Cambridge, Massachusetts, 2000.
[25]	Young, O. R., Hitting The Mark: Why Are Some International Environmental Agreements More Successful Than Others? Environment 1999, 41, (8), 20-29.
[26]	Bauer, R. R., The United States Approach to Water Pollution Control. In Environmental Law and Policy in the European Union and the United States, Baker, R., Ed. Praeger: Westport, Connecticut, 1997; pp. 169-179.
[27]	Heyes, A. G., Making Things Stick: Enforcement and Compliance. In Environmental Policy: Objectives, Instruments, and Implementation, Helm, D., Ed. Oxford University Press Inc.: New York, 2000; pp. 91-110.
[28]	Skjaerseth, J. B.; Wettestad, J., Understanding the Effectiveness of EU Environmental Policy: How Can Regime Analysis Contribute? Environmental Politics 2002, 11, (3), 99.
[29]	Cendrero, A.; Francés, E.; Corral, D. D.; Fermán, J. L.; Fischer, D.; Río, L. D.; Camino, M.; López, A., Indicators and Indices of Environmental Quality for Sustainability Assessment in Coastal Areas; Application to Case Studies in Europe and the Americas. Journal of Coastal Research 2003, 19, (4), 919-933.
[30]	Drapeau, P.; Leduc, A.; Giroux, J.-F.; Savard, J.-P. L.; Bergeron, Y.; Vickery, W. L., Landscape-Scale Disturbances and Changes in Bird Communities of Boreal Mixed-Wood Forests. Ecological Monographs 2000, 70, (3), 423-444.
[31]	Assmann, S. M., Natural Variation in Abiotic Stress and Climate Change Responses in Arabidopsis: Implications for Twenty-First-Century Agriculture. International Journal of Plant Sciences 2013, 174, (1), 3-26.
[32]	Silva, D. E.; Badeau, V.; Legay, M.; Corcket, E.; Dupouey, J.-L., Tracking human impact on current tree species distribution using plant communities. Journal of Vegetation Science 2012, 23, (2), 313-324.
[33]	Edwards, M.; Johns, D. G.; Leterme, S. C.; Svendsen, E.; Richardson, A. J., Regional Climate Change and Harmful Algal Blooms in the Northeast Atlantic. Limnology and Oceanography 2006, 51, (2), 820-829.
[34]	Bignert , A.; Cossa, D.; Emmerson, R.; Fryer, R.; Füll, C.; Fumega, J.; Laane, R.; Calls, H. M.; McHugh, B.; Miller, B.; Millward, G.; Roose, P.; Ruus, A.; Schmolke, S.; Smedes, F.; Strand, J.; Stronkhorst, J.; Thain, J.; Tissier, C.; Tronczynski, J., Final Report. In OSPAR/ICES Workshop on the Evaluation and Update of Background Reference Concentrations (BRCs) and Ecotoxilogical Assessment Criteria (EACs) and how these Assessment Tools Should Be Used in Assessing Contaminants in Water, Sediment and Biota. Traas, T.; Pijnenburg, J.; Moffat, C., Eds. The Hague, Netherlands, 2004, February 9-14.
[35]	Reijnders, P. J. H.; Brasseur, S. M. J. M.; Borchardt, T.; Camphuysen, K.; Czeck, R.; Gilles, A.; Jensen, L. F.; Leopold, M.; Lucke, K.; Ramdohr, S.; Scheidat, M.; Siebert, U.; Teilmann, J. Wadden Sea Ecosystem No. 25. Quality Status Report 2009. Thematic Report No. 20. Marine Mammals. Considered during the Tenth Meeting of the Conference of the Parties, Bergen, 20-25 November 2011. Common Wadden Sea Secretariat, Trilateral Monitoring and Assessment Group. UNEP/CMS/Inf.10.18.7.; 2009.
[36]	IPCC Contribution of Working Group I to the Fourth Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change; 2007.
[37]	Ramsar Secretariat Guidelines for the rapid assessment of inland, coastal and marine wetland biodiversity (Resolution IX.1 Annex E i). www.ramsar.org/pdf/key_guide_rapidassessment_e.pdf
[38]	Bauer, M.; Hoagland, P.; Leschine, T. M.; Blount, B. G.; Pomeroy, C. M.; Lampl, L. L.; Scherer, C. W.; Ayres, D. L.; Tester, P. A.; Sengco, M. R.; Sellner, K. G.; Schumacker, J., The importance of human dimensions research in managing harmful algal blooms. Frontiers in Ecology and the Environment 2010, 8, (2), 75-83.
[39]	ECE Convention on the Protection and Use of Transboundary Watercourses and International Lakes: Strategies for Monitoring and Assessment of Transboundary Rivers, Lakes and Groundwaters; Water Convention Secretariat, UN/ECE: Geneva, 2006.
[40]	UNEP/MAP, UNEP/MAP: State of the Mediterranean Marine and Coastal Environment, UNEP/MAP – Barcelona Convention, Athens, 2012. 2012.
[41]	de Mora, S. Report to UNEP: Review of Marine Pollution Monitoring and Assessment in UNEP's Regional Seas Programmes; IAEA - Marine Environment Laboratory: Monaco, 2004.
[42]	UNEP/WHO Water Quality Monitoring. A Practical Guide to the Design and Implementation of Freshwater Quality Studies and Monitoring Programmes; E&FN SPON: London, UK, 1996.
[43]	Bennett, A.; George, A. L., Process Tracing in Case Study Research. In MacArthur Foundation Workshop on Case Study Methods, Belfer Center for Science and International Affairs (BCSIA), Harvard University. October 17-19, 1997. Available at http://users.polisci.wisc.edu/kritzer/teaching/ps816/ProcessTracing.htm, 1997.
[44]	Victor, D. G.; Raustiala, K.; Skolnikoff, E. B., The Implementation and Effectiveness of International Environmental Commitments: Theory and Practice. MIT Press: Cambridge, Massachusetts, 1998.
[45]	Saez, R., The Case of a Renewable Natural Resource: Timber Extraction and Trade. In The Environment and International Trade Negotiations: Developing Country Stakes, Tussie, D., Ed. St. Martin's Press, Inc: New York, 2000; pp. 13-31.
[46]	Young, O. R., Regime Effectiveness: Taking Stock. In The Effectiveness of International Environmental Regimes: Causal Connections and Behavioral Mechanisms, Young, O. R., Ed. The MIT Press: Cambridge, Massachusetts, 1999; pp. 249-287.
[47]	Hisschemöller, M.; Gupta, J., Problem-Solving through International Environmental Agreements: The Issue of Regime Effectiveness. International Political Science Review 1999, 20, (2), 151-174.
[48]	CBD Secretariat Technical Advice on the Establishment and Management of a National System of Marine and Coastal Protected Areas (CBD Technical Series no. 13); Secretariat of the Convention on Biological Diversity: Montreal, Canada, 2004.
[49]	Ramsar Secretariat, Report of the Secretary General on the Implementation of the Convention at the Global Level. Information Document No. 6 to the COP 10 of the Ramsar Convention. Ramsar COP10 DOC. 6. Retrieved from http://www.ramsar.org/cda/en/ramsar-documents-cops-cop10-10th-meeting-19357/main/ramsar/1-31-58-127%5E19357_4000_0__. 2008, 20 August.
[50]	Ramsar Secretariat, The Ramsar Strategic Plan 2009-2015. Retrieved from http://www.ramsar.org/cda/en/ramsar-documents-plans/main/ramsar/1-31-39_4000_0__. 2008.
[51]	Ramsar Secretariat, The Ramsar Strategic Plan 2003-2008. Retrieved from http://www.ramsar.org/cda/en/ramsar-documents-plans/main/ramsar/1-31-39_4000_0__. n.d.
[52]	Ramsar Secretariat, Resolution IX.1 Annex D: Ecological "outcome-oriented" indicators for assessing the implementation effectiveness of the Ramsar Convention. 9th Meeting of the Conference of the Contracting Parties to the Convention on Wetlands (Ramsar, Iran, 1971). Kampala, Uganda, 8-15 November 2005. Retrieved from http://www.ramsar.org/cda/en/ramsar-documents-resol-resolution-ix-1-annex-d/main/ramsar/1-31-107%5E23547_4000_0__. 2005.
[53]	Basel Secretariat, Strategic Plan for the Implementation of the Basel Convention. Retrieved from http://www.basel.int/TheConvention/StrategicPlan/ReportontheStrategicPlan/tabid/1554/Default.aspx. 2002.
[54]	Basel Secretariat, Report on the Review of the Implementation of the Current Strategic Plan, Basel Convention (March 2009). Retrieved from http://www.basel.int/TheConvention/StrategicPlan/ReportontheStrategicPlan/tabid/1554/Default.aspx. 2009, March.
[55]	CMS Secretariat, Resolution 5.4. Strategy for the Future Development of the Convention. Adopted by the Conference of the Parties at its Fifth Meeting (Geneva, 10-16 April 1997). Retrieved from http://www.cms.int/bodies/COP/cop5/cop5_documents_overview.htm. . 1997.
[56]	CBD Secretariat, MOP 5 Decision BS-V/15 BS-V/15.Assessment and review (Article 35). Fifth meeting of the Conference of the Parties serving as the meeting of the Parties to the Cartagena Protocol on Biosafety (COP-MOP 5). 11 - 15 October 2010 - Nagoya, Aichi Prefecture, Japan. Retrieved from https://www.cbd.int/decision/mop/default.shtml?id=12328
[57]	Honkonen, T., The Common but Differentiated Responsibility Principle in Multilateral Environmental Agreements: Regulator and Policy Aspects. Kluwer Law International: The Netherlands, 2009.
[58]	Kutting, G., Environment, Society and International Relations: Towards More Effective International Environmental Agreements. Routledge: New York, 2000.
[59]	Kaczorowska, A., International Trade Conventions and Their Effectiveness: Present and Future. Kluwer Law International: The Hague, Netherlands, 1995.
[60]	Peterson, M. J., International Organizations and the Implementation of Environmental Regimes. In Global Governance: Drawing Insights from the Environmental Experience, Young, O. R., Ed. The MIT Press: Cambridge, Massachusetts, 1997; pp. 115-151.
[61]	Bohmelt, T.; Pilster, U. H., International Environmental Regimes: Legalisation, Flexibility and Effectiveness. Australian Journal of Political Science 2010, 45, (2), 245-260.
[62]	Dombrowsky, I., Institutional design and regime effectiveness in transboundary river management -- the Elbe water quality regime. Hydrology & Earth System Sciences 2008, 12, (1), 223-238.
[63]	Miles, E. L.; Underdal, A.; Andresen, S.; Wettestad, J.; Skjaerseth, J. B.; Carlin, E. M., Environmental Regime Effectiveness: Confronting Theory with Evidence. The MIT Press: Cambridge, Massachusetts, 2002.
[64]	Skjaerseth, J. B., Toward the End of Dumping in the North Sea: The Case of the Oslo Commission. In Environmental Regime Effectiveness: Confronting Theory with Evidence, Miles, E. L.; Underdal, A.; Andresen, S.; Wettestad, J.; Skjaerseth, J. B.; Carlin, E. M., Eds. The MIT Press: Cambridge, Massachusetts, 2002; pp. 65-85.
[65]	Seelarbokus, C. B., Effectiveness of Environmental Treaties: Trend Analysis of Treaty-Based Environmental Indicators. Journal of Environmental Assessment Policy and Management 2005, 7, (3), 493-541.
[66]	Mitchell, R. B., International Environmental Agreements Database Project (Version 2013.1). Retrieved from http://iea.uoregon.edu/. . 2002-2013.
[67]	Young, O. R., Effectiveness of International Environmental Regimes: Existing Knowledge, Cutting-edge Themes, and Research Strategies. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America 2011, 108, (50), 19853–19860, doi: 10.1073/pnas.1111690108.
[68]	Young, O. R., International Cooperation: Building Regimes for Natural Resources and the Environment. Cornell University Press: Ithaca, 1989.
[69]	Morrow, J. D., Modeling the Forms of International Cooperation: Distribution versus Information. International Organization 1994, 48, (3), 387-423.
[70]	Benedick, R. E., Protecting the Ozone Layer: New Directions in Diplomacy. In Preserving the Global Environment: The Challenge of Shared Leadership, Mathews, J. T., Ed. W.W. Norton: New York, 1998.
[71]	Rowlands, I. H., Explaining National Climate Change Policies. Global Environmental Change 1995, 5, (3), 235-249.
[72]	Doos, B. R., Environmental Issues Requiring International Action. In Environmental Protection and International Law, Lang, W.; Neuhold, H.; Zemanek, K., Eds. Graham & Trotman: Boston, 1991; p Chapter 1.
[73]	Porter, G.; Brown, J. W., Global Environmental Politics. First ed.; Westview Press, Inc.: Boulder, Colorado, 1991.
[74]	Corrales, M.; Dreyfus, T., Negotiations Over Auto Emissions Standards in the European Economic Community, 1983-1989. In Nine Case Studies in International Environmental Negotiation, Susskind, L. E., Ed. The MIT-Public Disputes Program.: Mass., 1990; pp et. al. 49-74.
[75]	Bodea, S., The Convention on Early Notification and on Assistance in the Case of Nuclear Accident 21 July-15 August, 1986, Vienna. In Nine Case Studies in International Environmental Negotiation, Susskind, L. E.; et.al., Eds. The MIT-Harvard Public Disputes Program: Mass., 1990; pp 207-225.
[76]	Boehmer-Christiansen, S., The Role of Science in the International Regulation of Pollution. In International Resource Management: The Role of Science and Politics, Andresen, S.; Ostreng, W., Eds. Belhaven Press: London, 1989; p Chapter 8.
[77]	Bodansky, D., Prologue to the Climate Change Convention. In Negotiating Climate Change: The Inside Story of the Rio Convention, I.M., M.; Leonard, J. A., Eds. Cambridge University Press: Cambridge, Massachusetts, 1994; p Chapter 2.
[78]	Citron, K., Experience of a Negotiator at the Stockholm Conference. In Processes of International Negotiations, Mautner-Markhof, F., Ed. Westview Press: Chapter 7. San Francisco, 1989.
[79]	Grunert, H., Negotiations in Our Time. In Processes of International Negotiations, Mautner-Markhof, F., Ed. Westview Press.: Chapter 20. San Francisco, 1989.
[80]	Najam, A., International Environmental Negotiation: A Strategy for the South. In Papers on International Environmental Negotiation, Volume III., Susskind, L. E., Ed. Program on Negotiation at Harvard Law School: Cambridge, Mass., 1993; pp. 187-230.
[81]	Borione, D.; Ripert, J., Exercising Common But Differentiated Responsibility. In Negotiating Climate Change: The Inside Story of the Rio Convention, I.M., M.; Leonard, J. A., Eds. Cambridge University Press: Cambridge, Mass., 1994; Chapter 3.
[82]	Dasgupta, C., The Climate Change Negotiations. In Negotiating Climate Change: The Inside Story of the Rio Convention, I.M., M.; Leonard, J. A., Eds. Cambridge University Press: Cambridge, Mass., 1994; Chapter 6.
[83]	Nayar, J. R.; Ong, D. M., Developing Countries, Development and the Conservation of Biological Diversity. In International Law and the Conservation of Biological Diversity, Bowman, M.; Regdwell, C., Eds. Kluwer Law International: Boston, 1996; Chapter 12.
[84]	McMahon, V., Environmental Nongovernmental Organizations at Intergovernmental Negotiations. In Papers on International Environmental Negotiation., Susskind, L. E., Siskind E. and Breslin J.W., Ed. Harvard Law School: Volume III. Program on Negotiation. Massachusetts, 1993; Vol. Volume III, Program on Negotiation, pp. 1-21.
[85]	Handl, G., Environmental Security and Global Change: The Challenges to International Law. In Environmental Protection and International Law, Lang, W., Neuhold H., and Zemanek K., Ed. Graham & Trotman: Boston, 1991.
[86]	Lindborg, N., Nongovernmental Organizations: Their Past, Present, and Future Role in International Environmental Negotiations. In International Environmental Treaty Making, Susskind, L. E., Siskind E. and Breslin J.W., Ed. Harvard Law School: Cambridge, Massachusetts, 1992.
[87]	Arend, T. E., Ivory, Elephants, or Both: Negotiating the Transfer of the African Elephant to an Appendix II Within CITES. In International Environmental Treaty-Making. Program on Negotiation, Susskind, L. E., Ed. Harvard Law School: Cambridge, MA, 1990.
[88]	Benedick, R. E., Ozone Diplomacy: New Directions in Safeguarding the Planet. Harvard University Press: Cambridge, Mass., 1991.
[89]	Bramble, B. J.; Porter, G., Non-Governmental Organizations and the Making of US International Environmental Policy. In The International Politics of the Environment, Hurrell, A. Kingsbury, B, Ed. Clarendon Press: Oxford, 1992; pp. 313-353.
[90]	Feld, W. J.; Jordan, R. S.; Hurwitz, L., International Organizations: A Comparative Approach. Praeger: Connecticut, 1994.
[91]	Rittberger, V., (I)NGOs and Global Governance: Introduction. In The Global Environment In the Twenty-First Century: Prospects for International Cooperation, Chasek, P. S., Ed. UN University Press: New York, 2000; pp. 83-86.
[92]	Stairs, K.; Peter Taylor. Non-Governmental Organizations and the Legal Protection of the Oceans: A Case Study. In The International Politics of the Environment, Hurrell, A. and Kingsbury, B. Eds. Clarendon Press: Oxford, 1992; pp. 110-141.
[93]	Wapner, P., The Transnational Politics of Environmental NGOs: Governmental, Economic, and Social Activism. In Chasek, P. S., Ed. UN University Press: New York, 2000; pp. 87-108.
[94]	Chayes, A.; Chayes, A. H., The new sovereignty : compliance with international regulatory agreements. Harvard University Press: Cambridge, Mass., 1995; p xii, 417.
[95]	Young, O. R., The Effectiveness of International Institutions: Hard Cases and Critical Variables. In Governance Without Government: Order and Change in World Politics, Rosenau, J. N.; Ernst-Otto, C., Eds. Cambridge University Press: Cambridge, 1992.
[96]	Victor, D. G.; Greene, O.; Lanchbery, J.; di Primio, J. C.; Anna, K. Review Mechanisms in the Effective Implementation of International Environmental Agreements; WP-94-114; IIASA: Laxenburg, Austria, November 1994, 1994; p. 3.
[97]	Treves, T.; Pineschi, L.; Tanzi, A.; Pitea, C.; Ragni, C.; Jacur, F. R., Non-Compliance Procedures and Mechanisms and the Effectiveness of International Environmental Agreements. Asser Press: The Hague, The Netherlands, 2009.
[98]	Cardesa-Salzmann, A., Constitutionalising Secondary Rules in Global Environmental Regimes: Non-Compliance Procedures and the Enforcement of Multilateral Environmental Agreements. Journal of Environmental Law 2012, 24, (1), 103-132.
[99]	Congleton, R. D., Political Regimes and Pollution Control. Review of Economics and Statistics 1992, 74, (August), 412-421.
[100]	Congleton, R., Governing the Global Environmental Commons: The Political Economy of International Environmental Treaties and Institutions. In International Environmental Economics: A Survey of Issues, Schulze, G. G.; Ursprung, H. W., Eds. Oxford University Press: Oxford, 2001.
[101]	Murdoch, J. C.; Sandler, T.; Sargent, K., Voluntary Cutbacks and Pretreaty Behavior: The Helsinki Protocol and Sulfur Emissions. Public Finance Review 1997, 25, (2), 139-62.
[102]	Arts, B., The Impact of Environmental NGOs on International Conventions. In Non-State Actors in International Relations, Arts, B., Math Noorman, and Bob Reinalda, Ed. Ashgate: Burlington, USA, 2001; pp. 195-210.
[103]	Schmidt, C., Designing International Environmental Agreements: Incentive Compatible Strategies for Cost-effective Cooperation. Edward Elgar: Northampton, MA, 2000.
[104]	Carraro, C., International Environmental Agreements on Climate Change. Kluwer Academic Publishers: Dordrecht, The Netherlands, 1999b.
[105]	Barrett, S., International Environmental Agreements as Games. In Conflicts and Cooperation in Managing Environmental Resources, Pethig, R., Ed. Springer: Berlin, 1992; pp. 11-36.
[106]	Carraro, C., The Structure of International Environmental Agreements. In International Environmental Agreements on Climate Change, Carraro, C., Ed. Kluwer Academic Publishers: Dordrecht, The Netherlands, 1999a; pp. 9-25.
[107]	Folmer, H.; De Zeeuw, A., International Environmental Problems and Policy. In Principles of Environmental and Resource Economics: A Guide for Students and Decision-Makers, Second ed.; Folmer, H.; Gabel, L. H., Eds. Edward Elgar: Northampton, MA, 2000; pp. 447-478.
[108]	Barrett, S., Trade Restrictions in International Environmental Agreements. London Business School: London, 1995.
[109]	Heister, J.; Mohr, E.; Plesmann, W.; Stahler, F.; Stoll , T.; Wolfrum, R. Economic and Legal Aspects of International Environmental Agreements - The Case of Enforcing and Stabilising an International CO2 Agreement; Kiel Working Paper No. 711; Kiel Institute of World Economics: 1995.
[110]	Botteon, M.; Carraro, C., Strategies for environmental negotiations: issue-linkage with heterogeneous countries. In Game Theory and the Environment, Hanley, N.; Folmer, H., Eds. Edward Elgar: Cheltenham, 1998; pp. 181-203.
[111]	Carraro, C., International Environmental Agreements: Strategic Policy Issues. Edward Elgar: Cheltenham, 1997.
[112]	Carraro, C.; Siniscalco, D., Policy Coordination For Sustainability: Commitments, Transfers, and Linked Negotiations. In The Economics of Sustainable Development, Goldin, I.; Winters, A., Eds. Cambridge University Press: Cambridge, 1995.
[113]	Cesar, H.; De Zeeuw, A., Issue Linkage in Global Environmental Problems. In Economic Policy for the Environment and Natural Resources, Xepapadeas, A., Ed. E. Elgar: Cheltenham, 1994.
[114]	Katsoulacos, Y., R&D Spillovers, R&D Cooperation, Innovation and International Environmental Agreements. In International Environmental Agreements: Strategic Policy Issues, Carraro, C., Ed. E. Elgar: Cheltenham, 1997.
[115]	Carraro, C.; Siniscalco, D., R&D Cooperation and the stability of international environmental agreements. In International Environmental Agreements: Strategic Policy Issues, Carraro, C., Ed. E. Elgar: Cheltenham, 1997.
[116]	Atkinson, A., Environment and Development: Concepts and Practices in Transition. Public Administration and Development 1991, II, 401-413. Quoted from Brinkerhoff and Gage, 2002.
[117]	Ledec, G., The Political Economy of Tropical Deforestation. In Divesting Nature's Capital: The Political Economy of Environmental Abuse in the Third World, Leonard, J. H., Ed. Holmes and Meier: New York, 1985; pp. 179-226.
[118]	Miller, M., Debt and the Environment: Converging Crises. United Nations Publications. Quoted from Brinkerhoff and Gage, 2002: New York, 1991.
[119]	Evans, P., Sustainability, Degradation, and Livelihood in Third World Cities: Possibilities for State-society Synergy. In The Global Environment In the Twenty-First Century: Prospects for International Cooperation, Chasek, P. S., Ed. 2000; pp. 42-63.
[120]	von Prittwitz, V., The Catastrophe Paradox: Elements of a Theory of Environmental Policy. Leske and Budrich: Opladen, Germany, 1990.
[121]	GAO International environment: Strengthening the implementation of environmental agreements; GAO: Washington, D.C., 1992.
[122]	Lang, W.; Neuhold, H.; Zemanek, K., Environmental Protection and International Law. Graham & Trotman: Boston, 1991.
[123]	Hurrell, A.; Kingsbury, B., The International Politics of the Environment. Clarendon Press: Oxford, 1992.
[124]	Brinkerhoff, D. W.; Cage, J. D., Natural Resources Management Policy in Africa: Implementation Challenges for Public Managers. In Environmental Policy and Developing Nations, Nagel, S. S., Ed. McFarland & Company, Inc., Publishers: North Carolina, 2002.
[125]	Cowhey, P. F., Domestic Institutions and the Credibility of International Commitments: Japan and the United States. International Organization 1993, 47, (2), 299-326.
[126]	Nagel, S. S., Environmental Policy and Developing Nations. McFarland & Company, Inc., Publishers: North Carolina, 2002.
[127]	Caldwell, L. K., Beyond Environmental Diplomacy: The Changing Institutional Structure of International Cooperation. In International Environmental Diplomacy, Carroll, J. E., Ed. Cambridge University Press: New York, 1988; pp. 13-28.
[128]	Mallya, F.; Talbott, K. Constraints and Opportunities for Building Local Participation in the Uganda Environmental Action Plan; World Resources Institute, Center for International Development and Environment: Washington, DC, 1990.
[129]	OKeefe, P.; Kirby, J.; Cherrett, I., Mozambican Environmental Problems: Myths and Realities. Public Administration and Development 1991, 11, 307-324. Quoted from Brinkerhoff and Cage, 2002. p. 103.
[130]	UNEP/CMS Review of Article IV: Agreements Concluded or Under Development. Report presented at the Fifth Meeting of the Conference of Parties of the Convention on the Conservation of Migratory Species of Wild Animals; 1997, 24 March.
[131]	Susskind, L., Environmental Diplomacy : Negotiating More Effective Global Agreements. Oxford University Press: New York, 1994; p xii, 201.
[132]	Hanf, K., Implementing International Environmental Policies. In Prospects For Environmental Change, Blowers, A.; Glasbergen, P., Eds. John Wiley & Son: New York, 1995; pp. 197-221.
[133]	Seelarbokus, C. B. International Environmental Agreements: Factors Influencing Effectiveness and Participation. Unpublished Master’s Thesis. Louisiana State University, Baton Rouge, Louisiana, 1998.
[134]	Bretschger, L.; Egli, H., Sustainable Growth in Open Economies. In International Environmental Economics: A Survey of the Issues, Schulze, G. G.; Ursprung, H. W., Eds. Oxford University Press: New York, 2001; pp. 183-208.
[135]	Harris, P. G., International Equity and Global Environmental Politics: Power and Principles in US Foreign Policy. Ashgate Publishing Limited: Burlington, VT, 2001.
[136]	Von Moltke, K., International Commissions and Implementation of International Environmental Law. In International Environmental Diplomacy, Carroll, J. E., Ed. Cambridge University Press: Cambridge, 1988; pp. 87-93.
[137]	Birnie, P., The Role of International Law in Solving Certain Environmental Conflicts. In International Environmental Diplomacy, Carroll, J. E., Ed. 1988; pp. 95-121.
[138]	Bjorkbom, L., Resolution of Environmental Problems: The Use of Diplomacy. In Carroll, J. E., Ed. 1988; pp. 123-137.
[139]	Homer-Dixon, T., On The Threshold: Environmental Changes as Causes of Acute Conflict. International Security 1991, 16, (1).
[140]	Manwaring, M. G., Environmental Security and Global Stability: Problems and Responses. Lexington Books: Lanham, Maryland, 2002.
[141]	Barnett, J., The Meaning of Environmental Security: Ecological Politics and Policy in the New Security Era. Zed Books: New York, 2001.
[142]	Conca, K.; Dabelko, G. D., Environmental Peacemaking. Woodrow Wilson Center Press and The John Hopkins University Press: Washington, D.C. and Baltimore, 2002.
[143]	Schlosberg, D., Environmental Justice and the New Pluralism: The Challenge of Difference for Environmentalism. Oxford University Press: New York, 1999.
[144]	Weiss, E. B., Intergenerational Equity: Toward an International Legal Framework. In Global Accord: Environmental Challenges and International Responses, Choucri, N., Ed. The MIT Press: Cambridge, Massachusetts, 1993; pp. 333-353.
[145]	Hertel, S., Promises to Keep: Securing Human Rights in a Changing World. United Nations Association of the United States of America: New York, 1994.
[146]	Felice, W. F., Taking Suffering Seriously: The Importance of Collective Human Rights. State University of New York Press: Albany, New York, 1996.
[147]	Donnelly, J., International Human Rights: A Regime Analysis. International Organization 1986, 40, (3), 599-642.
[148]	Stinchcombe, K.; Gibson, R. B., Strategic Environmental Assessment as a Means of Pursuing Sustainability: Ten Advantages and Ten Challenges. Journal of Environmental Assessment Policy and Management 2001, 3, (3), 343-373.
[149]	Pearce, D. W.; Barbier, E.; Markandya, A., Sustainable Development, Economics and Environment in the Third World. Edward Elgar.: London, 1990.
[150]	Neumayer, E., Weak versus Strong Sustainability: Exploring the Limits of Two Opposing Paradigms. Edward Elgar: Cheltenham, UK, 1999.
[151]	Malone, T. C., The Coastal Module of the Global Ocean Observing System (GOOS): An Assessment of Current Capabilities to Detect Change. Marine Policy 2003, 27, 295-302.
[152]	OECD. Environmental Indicators: Development, Measurement, and Use; OECD: Paris, 2003.
[153]	OECD. Key Environmental Indicators; OECD: Paris, 2008.
[154]	OECD. Environmental Indicators for Agriculture: Concepts and Framework; OECD: Paris, 1999.
[155]	OECD. Environmental Indicators: Towards Sustainable Development; OECD: Paris, 2001.
[156]	Hammond, A.; Adriaanse, A.; Rodenburg, E.; Bryant, D.; Woodward, R. Environmental Indicators: A Systematic Approach to Measuring and Reporting on Environmental Policy Performance in the Context of Sustainable Development; World Resources Institute: Washington, D.C., 1995.
[157]	Pearce, D.; Hamilton, K.; Atkinson, G., Measuring Sustainable Development: Progress on Indicators. Environment and Development Economics, 1, pp. 85-101. doi:10.1017/S1355770X00000395. 1996.
[158]	van Heijnsbergen, P., International Legal Protection of Wild Fauna and Flora. IOS Press: Amsterdam, The Netherlands, 1997.
[159]	Leadley, P.; Pereira, H. M.; Alkemade, R.; Fernandez-Manjarrés, J. F.; Proença, V.; Scharlemann, J. P. W.; Walpole, M. J. Biodiversity Scenarios: Projections of 21st Century Change in Biodiversity and Associated Ecosystem Services. Montreal. Technical Series. No. 50; Secretariat of the Convention on Biological Diversity: 2010.
[160]	Ervin, D. E., Trade, Agriculture, and Environment. In International Environmental Economics: A Survey of the Issues, Schulze, G. G.; Ursprung, H. W., Eds. Oxford University Press: New York, 2001; pp. 84-113.
[161]	HELCOM, Assessing the progress towards reaching HELCOM objectives for a healthy Baltic Sea. Retrieved from http://www.helcom.fi/BSAP_assessment/en_GB/main/2010, 28 May.
[162]	UNEP Ecosystem-based Management of Fisheries: Opportunities and challenges for coordination between marine Regional Fishery Bodies and Regional Seas Conventions. UNEP Regional Seas Reports and Studies No. 175. UNEP. http://www.unep.org/regionalseas/publications/reports/RSRS/; 2001.
[163]	UNEP Achievements and Planned Development of UNEP's Regional Seas Programme and Comparable Programmes Sponsored by Other Bodies. Regional Seas Reports and Studies No. 1. UNEP. http://www.unep.org/regionalseas/publications/reports/RSRS/; 1982.
[164]	UNEP/MAP, State of the Mediterranean Marine and Coastal Environment. Highlights for Policy-Makers. http://www.unepmap.org/2012.
[165]	ACCOBAMS Secretariat, Report of the 2nd Meeting of the Scientific Committee of ACCOBAMS. Recommendation 2.9: The fundamental need for information on abundance and distribution of cetaceans within the area. ANNEX XXXIVi. Retrieved from www.accobams.org/index.php?option=com_docman&task=doc... 2003, November.
[166]	UNEP Marine Litter: A Global Challenge; UNEP: Nairobi, 2009.
[167]	Ramsar Secretariat, Ramsar COP 10. Document 6 (page 3). Agenda Item XI. Report of the Secretary General on the Implementation of the Convention at the global level. 10th Meeting of the Conference of the Contracting Parties to the Convention on Wetlands (Ramsar, Iran, 1971). Changwon, Republic of Korea, 28 October - 4 November 2008. http://www.ramsar.org/cda/en/ramsar-documents-cops-cop10-10th-meeting-19357/main/ramsar/1-31-58-127%5E19357_4000_0__2008, November.
[168]	Bennett, G.; Mulongoy, K. J. Review of Experience with Ecological Networks, Corridors and Buffer Zones. CBD Technical Series No. 23. ; Secretariat of the Convention on Biological Diversity. Retrieved from https://www.cbd.int/doc/publications/cbd-ts-23.pdf: Montreal, Canada. , 2006, March.
[169]	Ramsar Secretariat, Resolution IX.1. Annex E. An Integrated Framework for Wetland Inventory, Assessment and Monitoring (IF-WIAM). 9th Meeting of the Conference of the Contracting Parties to the Convention on Wetlands (Ramsar, Iran, 1971). Kampala, Uganda, 8-15 November 2005. Retrieved from http://www.ramsar.org/cda/en/ramsar-documents-resol-resolution-ix-1-annex-e-23524/main/ramsar/1-31-107%5E23524_4000_0__. 2005, November.
[170]	UNECE, Guidance documents and other methodological materials for the implementation of the 1999 Protocol to Abate Acidification, Eutrophication and Ground-level Ozone (Gothenburg Protocol). Retrieved from http://www.unece.org/environmental-policy/treaties/air-pollution/guidance-documents-and-other-methodological-materials/gothenburg-protocol.html. n.d.
[171]	Rossi, P. H.; Freeman, H. E., Evaluation: A Systematic Approach. SAGE Publications: California, 1993.
[172]	Knaap, G. J.; Tschangho, J. K., Environmental Program Evaluation: Framing the Subject, Identifying Issues. In Environmental Program Evaluation: A Primer, Knaap, G. J.; Tschangho, J. K., Eds. University of Illinois Press: Chicago, 1998; pp. 1-20.
[173]	Seelarbokus, C. B., Assessing the Effectiveness of International Environmental Agreements (IEAs): Demystifying the Issue of Data Unavailability. SAGE Open 2014, 4, (1), DOI: 10.1177/2158244014521820.
[174]	Chape, S.; Harrison, J.; Spalding, M.; Lysenko, I., Measuring the Extent and Effectiveness of Protected Areas as an Indicator for Meeting Global Biodiversity Targets. Philosophical Transactions: Biological Sciences 2005, 360, (1454), 443-455.
[175]	Niemeijer, D.; de Groot, R. S., A conceptual framework for selecting environmental indicator sets. Ecological Indicators 2008, 8, 14-25.
[176]	Basel Secretariat, Guidance Document on Improving National Reporting by Parties to the Basel Convention. Committee for administering the Mechanism for promoting implementation and compliance of the Basel Convention. Retrieved from http://www.basel.int/Implementation/LegalMatters/Compliance/Overview/tabid/2308/Default.aspx2009, September.
[177]	Basel Secretariat, Report of the third meeting of the technical expert group to develop a framework for the environmentally sound management of wastes. Technical expert group to develop a framework for the environmentally sound management of wastes. Third meeting. Glion, Switzerland, 21–23 January 2013. UNEP/CHW/CLI/TEG.3/2. Retrieved from http://www.basel.int/Implementation/LegalMatters/CountryLedInitiative/OutcomeofCOP10/DevelopingguidelinesforESM/TechnicalExpertGroup/LatestMeeting/MeetingDocuments/tabid/2975/Default.aspx. 2013.
[178]	HELCOM. Development of a Set of Core Indicators: Interim report of the HELCOM CORESET Project. PART A. Description of the selection process. Balt. Sea Environ. Proc. No. 129A; 2012.
[179]	UNEP/MAP State of the Mediterranean Marine and Coastal Environment. 2012: Highlights for Policy-Makers. http://www.grida.no/publications/soemediterranean/; 2012.
[180]	NASCO, Interim Report of the Habitat Protection, Restoration and Enhancement Focus Area Review Group. Retrieved from http://www.nasco.int/implementation_plans.html. 2009, May 11.
[181]	Environment Canada, Data Sources and Methods for the Freshwater Quality Indicator. Retrieved from http://www.ec.gc.ca/indicateurs-indicators/default.asp?lang=en&n=5D193531-1. 2012, April.
[182]	Ozone Secretariat, Data Reporting and Access. Retrieved from http://ozone.unep.org/Data_Reporting/. 2004.
[183]	UNFCCC, GHG data from UNFCCC. Retrieved from http://unfccc.int/ghg_data/ghg_data_unfccc/items/4146.php. 2013.
[184]	CBD Secretariat, Implementation of the Strategic Plan: Evaluation of Progress Towards the 2010 Biodiversity Target: Development of Specific Targets, Indicators and a Reporting Framework. Conference of the Parties to the Convention on Biological Diversity. Seventh meeting. Kuala Lumpur, 9-20 and 27 February 2004. UNEP/CBD/COP/7/20/Add.3. Retrieved from www.cbd.int/doc/meetings/cop/cop-07/official/cop-07-20-add3-en.pdf. 2003, 4 December.
[185]	Dellas, E.; Pattberg, P.; Betsill, M., Agency in Earth System Governance: Refining a Research Agenda. International Environmental Agreements 2011, 11, 85-98. DOI 10.1007/s10784-011-9147-9.
[186]	Ringquist, E. J.; Kostadinova, T., Assessing the Effectiveness of International Environmental Agreements: The Case of the 1985 Helsinki Protocol. American Journal of Political Science 2005, 49, (1), 86-102.
[187]	Cason, J. W.; Ramaswamy, S., An Introduction to the Debates. In Development and Democracy: New Perspectives on an Old Debate, Ramaswamy, S.; Cason, J. W., Eds. University Press of New England: London, 2003.
[188]	Rengger, N. J., International Relations, Political Theory and the Problem of Order: Beyond International Relations Theory? Routledge: New York, 2000.
[189]	Rogers, P. C., Co-producing Philanthropic Knowledge in African American Communities. In Fundraising in Diverse Cultural and Giving Environments. New Directions for Philanthropic Fundraising. No. 37. Fall 2002. pp. 23-33, Fogal, R., Ed. 2002.

Cite This Article

Plain Text BibTeX RIS

APA Style

Chenaz B. Seelarbokus. (2014). International Environmental Agreements (IEAs): An Integrated Perspective on the Concept of Effectiveness. International Journal of Environmental Protection and Policy, 2(2), 76-95. https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ijepp.20140202.15

Copy | Download

ACS Style

Chenaz B. Seelarbokus. International Environmental Agreements (IEAs): An Integrated Perspective on the Concept of Effectiveness. Int. J. Environ. Prot. Policy 2014, 2(2), 76-95. doi: 10.11648/j.ijepp.20140202.15

Copy | Download

AMA Style

Chenaz B. Seelarbokus. International Environmental Agreements (IEAs): An Integrated Perspective on the Concept of Effectiveness. Int J Environ Prot Policy. 2014;2(2):76-95. doi: 10.11648/j.ijepp.20140202.15

Copy | Download

@article{10.11648/j.ijepp.20140202.15,
  author = {Chenaz B. Seelarbokus},
  title = {International Environmental Agreements (IEAs): An Integrated Perspective on the Concept of Effectiveness},
  journal = {International Journal of Environmental Protection and Policy},
  volume = {2},
  number = {2},
  pages = {76-95},
  doi = {10.11648/j.ijepp.20140202.15},
  url = {https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ijepp.20140202.15},
  eprint = {https://article.sciencepublishinggroup.com/pdf/10.11648.j.ijepp.20140202.15},
  abstract = {The effectiveness of international environmental agreements (IEAs) has been conceptualized in various ways in the literature, and several assessment methodologies have been postulated. There has not been any attempt at integrating the various perspectives, nor of determining the fit between the assessment methodology and the goals of the IEAs or of the IEA institutions. This article reviews the various effectiveness conceptualizations, and proposes the ‘effectiveness web’ as an integrative framework for understanding the inter-relationships that exist among the various determinants and potential indicators of IEA effectiveness. This article argues for an evolutionary and dynamic conceptualization of IEA effectiveness, as well as a multi-track assessment of effectiveness, which is more in line with the activities of the IEA institutions. This article identifies potential indicators for various stages of the life-cycle of an IEA, and using the premise of global environmental sustainability as guiding framework, provides a hierarchy of effectiveness assessment methodologies.},
 year = {2014}
}

Copy | Download

TY  - JOUR
T1  - International Environmental Agreements (IEAs): An Integrated Perspective on the Concept of Effectiveness
AU  - Chenaz B. Seelarbokus
Y1  - 2014/03/30
PY  - 2014
N1  - https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ijepp.20140202.15
DO  - 10.11648/j.ijepp.20140202.15
T2  - International Journal of Environmental Protection and Policy
JF  - International Journal of Environmental Protection and Policy
JO  - International Journal of Environmental Protection and Policy
SP  - 76
EP  - 95
PB  - Science Publishing Group
SN  - 2330-7536
UR  - https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ijepp.20140202.15
AB  - The effectiveness of international environmental agreements (IEAs) has been conceptualized in various ways in the literature, and several assessment methodologies have been postulated. There has not been any attempt at integrating the various perspectives, nor of determining the fit between the assessment methodology and the goals of the IEAs or of the IEA institutions. This article reviews the various effectiveness conceptualizations, and proposes the ‘effectiveness web’ as an integrative framework for understanding the inter-relationships that exist among the various determinants and potential indicators of IEA effectiveness. This article argues for an evolutionary and dynamic conceptualization of IEA effectiveness, as well as a multi-track assessment of effectiveness, which is more in line with the activities of the IEA institutions. This article identifies potential indicators for various stages of the life-cycle of an IEA, and using the premise of global environmental sustainability as guiding framework, provides a hierarchy of effectiveness assessment methodologies.
VL  - 2
IS  - 2
ER  -

Copy | Download

Author Information

Chenaz B. Seelarbokus

Department of Political Science and International Affairs, Kennesaw State University, Kennesaw, United States of America

Download PDF

Sections

Plain Text BibTeX RIS

APA Style

Chenaz B. Seelarbokus. (2014). International Environmental Agreements (IEAs): An Integrated Perspective on the Concept of Effectiveness. International Journal of Environmental Protection and Policy, 2(2), 76-95. https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ijepp.20140202.15

Copy | Download

ACS Style

Chenaz B. Seelarbokus. International Environmental Agreements (IEAs): An Integrated Perspective on the Concept of Effectiveness. Int. J. Environ. Prot. Policy 2014, 2(2), 76-95. doi: 10.11648/j.ijepp.20140202.15

Copy | Download

AMA Style

Chenaz B. Seelarbokus. International Environmental Agreements (IEAs): An Integrated Perspective on the Concept of Effectiveness. Int J Environ Prot Policy. 2014;2(2):76-95. doi: 10.11648/j.ijepp.20140202.15

Copy | Download

@article{10.11648/j.ijepp.20140202.15,
  author = {Chenaz B. Seelarbokus},
  title = {International Environmental Agreements (IEAs): An Integrated Perspective on the Concept of Effectiveness},
  journal = {International Journal of Environmental Protection and Policy},
  volume = {2},
  number = {2},
  pages = {76-95},
  doi = {10.11648/j.ijepp.20140202.15},
  url = {https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ijepp.20140202.15},
  eprint = {https://article.sciencepublishinggroup.com/pdf/10.11648.j.ijepp.20140202.15},
  abstract = {The effectiveness of international environmental agreements (IEAs) has been conceptualized in various ways in the literature, and several assessment methodologies have been postulated. There has not been any attempt at integrating the various perspectives, nor of determining the fit between the assessment methodology and the goals of the IEAs or of the IEA institutions. This article reviews the various effectiveness conceptualizations, and proposes the ‘effectiveness web’ as an integrative framework for understanding the inter-relationships that exist among the various determinants and potential indicators of IEA effectiveness. This article argues for an evolutionary and dynamic conceptualization of IEA effectiveness, as well as a multi-track assessment of effectiveness, which is more in line with the activities of the IEA institutions. This article identifies potential indicators for various stages of the life-cycle of an IEA, and using the premise of global environmental sustainability as guiding framework, provides a hierarchy of effectiveness assessment methodologies.},
 year = {2014}
}

Copy | Download

TY  - JOUR
T1  - International Environmental Agreements (IEAs): An Integrated Perspective on the Concept of Effectiveness
AU  - Chenaz B. Seelarbokus
Y1  - 2014/03/30
PY  - 2014
N1  - https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ijepp.20140202.15
DO  - 10.11648/j.ijepp.20140202.15
T2  - International Journal of Environmental Protection and Policy
JF  - International Journal of Environmental Protection and Policy
JO  - International Journal of Environmental Protection and Policy
SP  - 76
EP  - 95
PB  - Science Publishing Group
SN  - 2330-7536
UR  - https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ijepp.20140202.15
AB  - The effectiveness of international environmental agreements (IEAs) has been conceptualized in various ways in the literature, and several assessment methodologies have been postulated. There has not been any attempt at integrating the various perspectives, nor of determining the fit between the assessment methodology and the goals of the IEAs or of the IEA institutions. This article reviews the various effectiveness conceptualizations, and proposes the ‘effectiveness web’ as an integrative framework for understanding the inter-relationships that exist among the various determinants and potential indicators of IEA effectiveness. This article argues for an evolutionary and dynamic conceptualization of IEA effectiveness, as well as a multi-track assessment of effectiveness, which is more in line with the activities of the IEA institutions. This article identifies potential indicators for various stages of the life-cycle of an IEA, and using the premise of global environmental sustainability as guiding framework, provides a hierarchy of effectiveness assessment methodologies.
VL  - 2
IS  - 2
ER  -

Copy | Download