Following the European colonizer arrived at and invades Canada, the Aboriginal people-who are considered as the natives, have been oppressed for many centuries. Their land was taken by the settlers and their economy become too sluggish and subsistence; they were marginalized in the social, economic, cultural and political arenas. This paper is aimed to assess the root causes of conflict between the aboriginals and settlers and to identify measures taken by the government to address the problems. We used intensive secondary data through reviewing different books and international journals. Lose of land ownership, deterioration of health and economic development, worst assimilation of Aboriginal People to the main stream culture, Political marginalization such under representation of them under government office, Economic exploitation of Aboriginal People are some of the real causes of conflict between Aboriginal and non- Aboriginal People. Besides, they are not also allowed to run their own business activities, exercise their cultural ways of life, improve and develop their culture and traditions. Federalism, multiculturalism, empowering Supreme Court and the constitution act of 1982 were of the institutional arrangement recognized typically to deal with the existing real conflict and to accommodate diversity. Some of possible measures taken by the government are- the recognition of the right to land title; the right to self-government on their internal matters, to develop their culture, language and identities. It also allowed developing laws like laws on customary marriage for their people though subject to the approval of the minister responsible for their affairs have also been recognized to exercise.
Published in | Humanities and Social Sciences (Volume 3, Issue 4) |
DOI | 10.11648/j.hss.20150304.15 |
Page(s) | 155-158 |
Creative Commons |
This is an Open Access article, distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, provided the original work is properly cited. |
Copyright |
Copyright © The Author(s), 2015. Published by Science Publishing Group |
Aboriginal, Accommodation, Conflict, Diversity, Federalism
[1] | Anderson R. (2002).Entrepreneurship and aboriginal Canadians: a case studies in Economic development’, Journal of Development Entrepreneurship, Vol. 7, No. 1, pp.45–66. |
[2] | Anderson, Robert B and Camp II, Ronald D(2005).Indigenous land rights in Canada: the foundation for development. Regina, Canada. International Journal of Entrepreneurship and Small Business, Vol. 2 No. 2, 2005. |
[3] | Beranger Claude (2004). Provinces and territories of Canada. |
[4] | Belange Claude. (nd). Language Policy and Education in Canada. Memorial University of Newfoundland. Canada. |
[5] | Borrows John (2005).Tracking Trajectories: Aboriginal Governance as an Aboriginal Right 38 UBC Law Review 285. |
[6] | Chevrier Marc (1996).Canadian federalism and the autonomy of Québec: A historical Viewpoint: |
[7] | David Adam and McDonald (2004) . Collaboration, Competition, and Coercion: Canadian Federalism and Blood System Governance. Ontario, Canada. University of Waterloo. |
[8] | Hyman Ilene and Mein hard, Agnes (2011).The Role of Multiculturalism Policy in Addressing Social inclusion Processes in Canada. |
[9] | Thomas Isaac and Anthony Knox (2004).Creating Certainty in Resource Development. University of New Brunswick Law Journal (2004, Vol. 53). |
[10] | Native Women‘s Association of Canada (NWAC). 1996. Policing and Aboriginal women. Ottawa: Native Women‘s Association of Canada. |
[11] | Joshee Reva. (2010). Multicultural Education, Diversity, and Citizenship in Canada. Working paper for the IALEI Workshop on Multicultural Education. Seoul, Korea. Feb. 17-19, 2010. |
[12] | Robert Sagar J. and Helgruan, David M. (2008) World Geography To Day printed in New York, United states of America.pp198-205. |
[13] | Siemiatycki Myer and Tim Rees (2000) Integrating Community Diversity in Toronto: On who’s Terms? March 2001 Ceris .CERIS Working Paper No. 14. |
[14] | Simeon Richard (1998) Considerations on the Design of Canadian Federations,” SA Public Law 13, 2 (June 1998): 2-12. |
[15] | Sivell J. (1988) Canadian Multiculturalism Act. Passed July 21, 1988. |
[16] | Slattery Brian (2007). Taxonomy of Aboriginal Rights. Aboriginal title, the Calder Case, and the Future of Indigenous Rights. Vancouver: UBC Press,.111-128.) |
[17] | Vladislav B. Sotirović. National identity: who Are the Albanians? the Illyrian Anthroponymy and the Ethnogenesis of the Albanians. History Research. Vol. 1, No. 2, 2013, pp. 5-24. doi: 10.11648/j.history.20130102.11 |
[18] | Yabo Li, Cultural Identity in Intercultural Communication, Social Sciences. Vol. 4, No. 2, 2015, pp. 23-26. doi: 10.11648/j.ss.20150402.11 |
APA Style
Alene Agegnehu, Ayele Behaylu. (2015). Aboriginal People and the Canadian Federation. Humanities and Social Sciences, 3(4), 155-158. https://doi.org/10.11648/j.hss.20150304.15
ACS Style
Alene Agegnehu; Ayele Behaylu. Aboriginal People and the Canadian Federation. Humanit. Soc. Sci. 2015, 3(4), 155-158. doi: 10.11648/j.hss.20150304.15
AMA Style
Alene Agegnehu, Ayele Behaylu. Aboriginal People and the Canadian Federation. Humanit Soc Sci. 2015;3(4):155-158. doi: 10.11648/j.hss.20150304.15
@article{10.11648/j.hss.20150304.15, author = {Alene Agegnehu and Ayele Behaylu}, title = {Aboriginal People and the Canadian Federation}, journal = {Humanities and Social Sciences}, volume = {3}, number = {4}, pages = {155-158}, doi = {10.11648/j.hss.20150304.15}, url = {https://doi.org/10.11648/j.hss.20150304.15}, eprint = {https://article.sciencepublishinggroup.com/pdf/10.11648.j.hss.20150304.15}, abstract = {Following the European colonizer arrived at and invades Canada, the Aboriginal people-who are considered as the natives, have been oppressed for many centuries. Their land was taken by the settlers and their economy become too sluggish and subsistence; they were marginalized in the social, economic, cultural and political arenas. This paper is aimed to assess the root causes of conflict between the aboriginals and settlers and to identify measures taken by the government to address the problems. We used intensive secondary data through reviewing different books and international journals. Lose of land ownership, deterioration of health and economic development, worst assimilation of Aboriginal People to the main stream culture, Political marginalization such under representation of them under government office, Economic exploitation of Aboriginal People are some of the real causes of conflict between Aboriginal and non- Aboriginal People. Besides, they are not also allowed to run their own business activities, exercise their cultural ways of life, improve and develop their culture and traditions. Federalism, multiculturalism, empowering Supreme Court and the constitution act of 1982 were of the institutional arrangement recognized typically to deal with the existing real conflict and to accommodate diversity. Some of possible measures taken by the government are- the recognition of the right to land title; the right to self-government on their internal matters, to develop their culture, language and identities. It also allowed developing laws like laws on customary marriage for their people though subject to the approval of the minister responsible for their affairs have also been recognized to exercise.}, year = {2015} }
TY - JOUR T1 - Aboriginal People and the Canadian Federation AU - Alene Agegnehu AU - Ayele Behaylu Y1 - 2015/07/17 PY - 2015 N1 - https://doi.org/10.11648/j.hss.20150304.15 DO - 10.11648/j.hss.20150304.15 T2 - Humanities and Social Sciences JF - Humanities and Social Sciences JO - Humanities and Social Sciences SP - 155 EP - 158 PB - Science Publishing Group SN - 2330-8184 UR - https://doi.org/10.11648/j.hss.20150304.15 AB - Following the European colonizer arrived at and invades Canada, the Aboriginal people-who are considered as the natives, have been oppressed for many centuries. Their land was taken by the settlers and their economy become too sluggish and subsistence; they were marginalized in the social, economic, cultural and political arenas. This paper is aimed to assess the root causes of conflict between the aboriginals and settlers and to identify measures taken by the government to address the problems. We used intensive secondary data through reviewing different books and international journals. Lose of land ownership, deterioration of health and economic development, worst assimilation of Aboriginal People to the main stream culture, Political marginalization such under representation of them under government office, Economic exploitation of Aboriginal People are some of the real causes of conflict between Aboriginal and non- Aboriginal People. Besides, they are not also allowed to run their own business activities, exercise their cultural ways of life, improve and develop their culture and traditions. Federalism, multiculturalism, empowering Supreme Court and the constitution act of 1982 were of the institutional arrangement recognized typically to deal with the existing real conflict and to accommodate diversity. Some of possible measures taken by the government are- the recognition of the right to land title; the right to self-government on their internal matters, to develop their culture, language and identities. It also allowed developing laws like laws on customary marriage for their people though subject to the approval of the minister responsible for their affairs have also been recognized to exercise. VL - 3 IS - 4 ER -