Here it is started with the proportionality between Planck’s and related gravitational parameters. Using the ratio between Planck mass and related minimal gravitational radius (half of Planck length) we obtain maximal radial density (kg/m) in gravitational field. On the other hand, minimal radial density one obtains using the ratio between Planck mass and related maximal radius in gravitational field. It is based on new Relativistic Alpha Field Theory (RAFT) that predicts the existence of minimal and maximal gravitational radius in a gravitational field. Thus, no singularity at the minimal gravitational radius and no infinity at the maximal gravitational radius. It is shown that the maximal radial density is constant and is valid for all amounts of masses. Also, minimal radial density is constant and is valid for all amounts of masses. Using Planck parameters, it is calculated the energy conservation constant k = 0.999934. Since this constant is less from unity and grater from zero, the minimal gravitational radius cannot be zero (no singularity in a gravitational field) and maximal gravitational radius cannot be infinitive (no infinity in gravitational field). Here quantization of a gravitational field is based on the multiplication of the minimal gravitational length (twice of minimal radius) by parameter n =1, 2,… The calculation of the minimum time transition between two quantum state for the proton gives 0.413466×10-62 seconds. The minimal expansion time from minimal to maximal radius of proton is equal to 1.253992×10-58 sec. This is in accordance with recently observation, revealing nano big bang: the first millisecond of crystal formation. The calculation of the minimum time transition between two quantum state for Universe is 13.948503×109 years. The minimal expansion time from minimal to maximal radius of Universe is equal to 422,151.136168×109 years. Previous calculation is based on the velocity equal to the speed of light. Since the real transition velocity is less than the speed of light, the real transition and expansion times are greater compare to the previous calculation. Following the previous results, one can understand why the quantum approach has only sense for the small mases i.e. particles.
| Published in | American Journal of Modern Physics (Volume 10, Issue 2) |
| DOI | 10.11648/j.ajmp.20211002.12 |
| Page(s) | 30-35 |
| Creative Commons |
This is an Open Access article, distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, provided the original work is properly cited. |
| Copyright |
Copyright © The Author(s), 2021. Published by Science Publishing Group |
Quantum States, Minimum Time Transition, Gravitational Field, Energy Conservation Constant, Planks Parameters
| [1] | R. Howl, V. Vedral, D. Naik, M. Christodoulou, C. Rovelli, and A. Iyer, Non-Gaussianity as a Signature of a Quantum Theory of Gravity, PRX Quantun 2, 010325 (2021). |
| [2] | Lisboa A. C.; Piqueira J. R. C. Minimum Time in Quantum State Transitions: Dynamical Foundations and Applications, book: Research Advances in Quantum in Quantum Dynamics, Chapter 6, Publisher: InTech, Aug. (2016). DOI: 10.5772/63025. |
| [3] | Nanohub organization resources 5018. Time dependent perturbation. https://nanohub.org/resources/5018/ |
| [4] | Bantikum S. M. Transition probability of particle’s Quantum State, Global Scientific Journal, GSJ: Vol. 6, Iss.-8, Aug. (2018). ISSN 2320-9186. www.globalscientificjournal.com |
| [5] | Ruffo A. R. One Particle Transitions and Correlation in Quantum Mechanics. Journal of Research of the National Bureau of Standards-A. Physics and Chemistry Vol. 69A, No. 2, March-April 1965. |
| [6] | Ruediger S. et al. A classical to quantum transition via key experiments. Eur. J. Phys. 41 055304 (2020). |
| [7] | Predominici-Scottle G., Palma J. Combining quantum mechanics and molecular mechanics. Same recent progresses in QM/MM methods. Advances in Quantum Chemistry, (2010). |
| [8] | Ohlsson T., Zhou, S. Transition probabilities in two level quantum System with PT symmetric nion Hermitian Hamiltonians. Journal of Mathematical Physics 61, 052104 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1063/5.0002958 |
| [9] | Lopez F. A. C., Allende S., Retamal S. Sudden transition between classical to quantum decoherence in bipartite correlated qutrit system. Scientific Reports, Vol. 7, 44654 (2017). |
| [10] | Chen C., Chang A. M., Melloch M. Transition between quantum states in a parallel coupled double quantum dot. Physical Review Letters 17, 176801, DOI: 10.1103/PhysRevLett.92.176801. |
| [11] | Kreuz M. at all. A method to measure the resonance transitions between the gravitationally bound quantum states of neutrons in the GRANIT spectrometer. Nucl. Instr. Meth. A 611 (2009) 326 DOI: 10.1016/j.nima.2009.07.059. |
| [12] | Remmy Z at all. Finding quantum critical points with neural network quantum states. 24th European Conference on Artificial Intelligence - ECAI 2020 Santiago de Compostela, Spain (2020). |
| [13] | Transitions Between Energy States https://courses.physics.ucsd.edu/2017/Spring/physics4e/transitions.pdf |
| [14] | Zviagin A. A. Dynamical quantum phase transition. Low Temperature Physics 42, 971 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1063/1.4969869 |
| [15] | Md. Manirul A., Huang Wei-Ming, Zhang Wei-Min, Quantum Thermodynamics of single Particle systems. Scientific Reports, vol. 10, 13500, (2020). |
| [16] | Namkung M., Kwon Y. Almost minimum discrimination of N-ary weak coherent states by Jaynes – Cummings Hamiltonian Dynamics. Scientific Reports, vol. 9, 19664 (2019). |
| [17] | Kai Xu at. all. Probing dynamical phase transitions with a superconducting quantum simulator. Science Advances 17, vol. 6, no. 25, eaba4935 (2017). DOI: 10.1126/sciady.aba4935. |
| [18] | Alessandro D. Introduction to Quantum Control and Dynamics CRC Press - Taylor & Francis Group, Boca Raton, FLA, 2007. |
| [19] | Pfeifer D. “How Fast Can a Quantum State Change with Time?” Physical Review Letters. v. 70, n. 22, 3365–3368, 1993. |
| [20] | Grover L. K. Quantum Mechanics helps in searching for a needle in haystack. Phys. Rev. Lett. 79, 2, 325-328, (1997). |
| [21] | Luo S. L. How fast can a quantum state evolve into a target state? Physica D: Nonlinear Phenomena. 189, 1, 1-7, 2004. |
| [22] | Sakurai J. J. Modern Quantum Mechanics. Revised Edition. Addison Wesley Publishing, Reading, Mass. Company, Inc., 1994. |
| [23] | K. Okuyamaa K.; Sakai K. JT gravity, KdV equations and macroscopic loop operators. SISSA, Springer, Jan. 24 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/JHEP01(2020)156 |
| [24] | Novakovic B. Relativistic Alpha Field Theory – Part I: Determination of Field Parameters. Inter. Jour. of New Technology and Research (IJNTR) ISSN: 2454-4116, Vol. 1, Iss. 5, Sept. (2015) https://doi.org./10.31871/IJNTR.15.15 |
| [25] | Novakovic B. Relativistic Alpha Field Theory – Part II: Does a Gravitational Field Could be Without Singularity? Inter. Jour. of New Technology and Research (IJNTR) ISSN: 2454-4116, Vol.-1, Iss.-5, Sept. (2015) 31. https://doi.org./10.31871/IJNTR.1.5.16 |
| [26] | Novakovic B. Relativistic Alpha Field Theory – Part III: Does Gravitational Force Becomes Positive if (GM/rc2) > 1? Inter. Jour. of New Technology and Research (IJNTR) ISSN: 2454-4116, Vol.-1, Iss.-5, Sept. (2015) 39. https://doi.org./IJNTR.1.5.17 |
| [27] | Novakovic B. New Discretization of Gravitational Field. Inter. Jour. of New Technology and Research (IJNTR) ISSN: 2454-4116, Vol.-6, Iss.-12, Dec. (2020) 7. https://doi.org/10.31871/IJNTR.6.12.7 |
| [28] | Novakovic B. Is Positive Gravitational Force Source of Dark Energy? Inter. Jour. of New Technology and Research (IJNTR) ISSN: 2454-4116, Vol.-1, Iss.-7, Nov. (2015) 7. https://doi.org/10.31871/IJNTR.1.7.5 |
| [29] | Novakovic B. Could tension between Planck’s and other observations be solved? Inter. Inter. Jour. of New Technology and Research (IJNTR) ISSN: 2454-4116, Vol.-6, Iss.-12, Dec. (2020) 7. https://doi.org/10.31871/IJNTR.6.9.18 |
| [30] | Rajna George. Fundamental Laws of Physics: Physicists measure the loss of dark matter since the birth of the universe. https://phys.org//hews/2016-12-physicists-loss-dark-birth-universe.html |
| [31] | Novakovic B. Connection between Planck’s and Gravitational Parameters. Inter. Jour. of New Technology and Research (IJNTR) ISSN: 2454-4116, Vol.-6, Iss.-12, Dec. (2020) 7. https://doi.org/10.31871/IJNTR.5.11.24 |
| [32] | Novakovic B. Energy Momentum Tensor Generates Repulsive Gravitational Force. Inter. Jour. of New Technology and Research (IJNTR) ISSN: 2454-4116, Vol.-5, Iss.-11, Nov. (2019) 45. https://doi.org/1031871/IJNTR.5.11.25 |
| [33] | Rajna George. Laser Proved Test of Einstein’s Theory: The potential of the diffraction pattern. http://www.cartage.org.lb/en/themes/sciences/physics/Nuclear Physics/WhatisNuclear/Forces/Forces.htm |
| [34] | Revealing nano big bang: Scientists observe the first millisecond of crystal formation. Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory, Mar. (2021). https://phys.org/news/2021-03-revealing-nano-big-scientists-milliseconds.html |
APA Style
Branko Novakovic. (2021). Minimum Time Transition Between Quantum States in Gravitational Field. American Journal of Modern Physics, 10(2), 30-35. https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ajmp.20211002.12
ACS Style
Branko Novakovic. Minimum Time Transition Between Quantum States in Gravitational Field. Am. J. Mod. Phys. 2021, 10(2), 30-35. doi: 10.11648/j.ajmp.20211002.12
AMA Style
Branko Novakovic. Minimum Time Transition Between Quantum States in Gravitational Field. Am J Mod Phys. 2021;10(2):30-35. doi: 10.11648/j.ajmp.20211002.12
Share This Article
Twitter
Linked In
Facebook
Copy
Download@article{10.11648/j.ajmp.20211002.12,
author = {Branko Novakovic},
title = {Minimum Time Transition Between Quantum States in Gravitational Field},
journal = {American Journal of Modern Physics},
volume = {10},
number = {2},
pages = {30-35},
doi = {10.11648/j.ajmp.20211002.12},
url = {https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ajmp.20211002.12},
eprint = {https://article.sciencepublishinggroup.com/pdf/10.11648.j.ajmp.20211002.12},
abstract = {Here it is started with the proportionality between Planck’s and related gravitational parameters. Using the ratio between Planck mass and related minimal gravitational radius (half of Planck length) we obtain maximal radial density (kg/m) in gravitational field. On the other hand, minimal radial density one obtains using the ratio between Planck mass and related maximal radius in gravitational field. It is based on new Relativistic Alpha Field Theory (RAFT) that predicts the existence of minimal and maximal gravitational radius in a gravitational field. Thus, no singularity at the minimal gravitational radius and no infinity at the maximal gravitational radius. It is shown that the maximal radial density is constant and is valid for all amounts of masses. Also, minimal radial density is constant and is valid for all amounts of masses. Using Planck parameters, it is calculated the energy conservation constant k = 0.999934. Since this constant is less from unity and grater from zero, the minimal gravitational radius cannot be zero (no singularity in a gravitational field) and maximal gravitational radius cannot be infinitive (no infinity in gravitational field). Here quantization of a gravitational field is based on the multiplication of the minimal gravitational length (twice of minimal radius) by parameter n =1, 2,… The calculation of the minimum time transition between two quantum state for the proton gives 0.413466×10-62 seconds. The minimal expansion time from minimal to maximal radius of proton is equal to 1.253992×10-58 sec. This is in accordance with recently observation, revealing nano big bang: the first millisecond of crystal formation. The calculation of the minimum time transition between two quantum state for Universe is 13.948503×109 years. The minimal expansion time from minimal to maximal radius of Universe is equal to 422,151.136168×109 years. Previous calculation is based on the velocity equal to the speed of light. Since the real transition velocity is less than the speed of light, the real transition and expansion times are greater compare to the previous calculation. Following the previous results, one can understand why the quantum approach has only sense for the small mases i.e. particles.},
year = {2021}
}
TY - JOUR T1 - Minimum Time Transition Between Quantum States in Gravitational Field AU - Branko Novakovic Y1 - 2021/04/23 PY - 2021 N1 - https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ajmp.20211002.12 DO - 10.11648/j.ajmp.20211002.12 T2 - American Journal of Modern Physics JF - American Journal of Modern Physics JO - American Journal of Modern Physics SP - 30 EP - 35 PB - Science Publishing Group SN - 2326-8891 UR - https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ajmp.20211002.12 AB - Here it is started with the proportionality between Planck’s and related gravitational parameters. Using the ratio between Planck mass and related minimal gravitational radius (half of Planck length) we obtain maximal radial density (kg/m) in gravitational field. On the other hand, minimal radial density one obtains using the ratio between Planck mass and related maximal radius in gravitational field. It is based on new Relativistic Alpha Field Theory (RAFT) that predicts the existence of minimal and maximal gravitational radius in a gravitational field. Thus, no singularity at the minimal gravitational radius and no infinity at the maximal gravitational radius. It is shown that the maximal radial density is constant and is valid for all amounts of masses. Also, minimal radial density is constant and is valid for all amounts of masses. Using Planck parameters, it is calculated the energy conservation constant k = 0.999934. Since this constant is less from unity and grater from zero, the minimal gravitational radius cannot be zero (no singularity in a gravitational field) and maximal gravitational radius cannot be infinitive (no infinity in gravitational field). Here quantization of a gravitational field is based on the multiplication of the minimal gravitational length (twice of minimal radius) by parameter n =1, 2,… The calculation of the minimum time transition between two quantum state for the proton gives 0.413466×10-62 seconds. The minimal expansion time from minimal to maximal radius of proton is equal to 1.253992×10-58 sec. This is in accordance with recently observation, revealing nano big bang: the first millisecond of crystal formation. The calculation of the minimum time transition between two quantum state for Universe is 13.948503×109 years. The minimal expansion time from minimal to maximal radius of Universe is equal to 422,151.136168×109 years. Previous calculation is based on the velocity equal to the speed of light. Since the real transition velocity is less than the speed of light, the real transition and expansion times are greater compare to the previous calculation. Following the previous results, one can understand why the quantum approach has only sense for the small mases i.e. particles. VL - 10 IS - 2 ER -
Email: